But fans aren't naive, and we all know that Ross and Rachel are still having their "on a break" arguments wherever they are these days. Rachel confesses to Ross she still has feelings for him, and they kiss. This thread is archived. She probably could have forgave him for misunderstanding and assuming things, but being deceitful over it after was the final nail in their relationship's coffin. Had Ross kept his clothes on during his time with Chloe, we might not even e having this conversation. Find out more here. It was incredibly stupid, selfish, and misguided every step of the way, no doubt. But that could really describe around 75% of the things that Ross did on Friends. Let’s start with the most controversial topic: whether or not they were on a break. First off being that it's ok for him to flip out when he assumed Rachel cheated while on a break? save. Yes, but I think the problem was how soon after they got on a break he slept with the other girl. Is Ross a better choice for Rachel than Joey? And when Rachel made it clear she wanted to take a break, Ross is the one that got huffy and left without clarifying what "a break from us" actually meant in that situation. However, he was clearly looking for rebound sex, even if he wasn't quite aware at the time that he wasn't actually on the rebound. During their fight after Rachel found out, Ross specifically says he thought she had broken up with him for real. (Sure, Rachel thought Mark was easy on the eye at that point, but she likely never would have crossed the line with Ross in the picture.) 2. 2 2 3 322. comments. Technically speaking… NO. Given that Mark admits a few episodes later that he always did have a thing for Rachel, I always felt he was taking advantage of the situation to try and further the wedge between Ross and Rachel. No matter what Ross' understanding of what Rachel meant by "going on a break" is utterly irrelevant. When a couple is on a break, what he did was ok, just ask Taylor Swift. Rachel was such a bitch to Julie. Ross had a lot of messed up double standards about the whole situation. Yeah. So he did not cheat, they were on a break. Ross promptly agrees to be her boyfriend again. So let's talk about which one of them is correct here. First is the general question of what a person is allowed to do while on a break. 3. Ross, perhaps foreseeing the complicated future they'd have together, requires the clarification that Rachel wants their relationship put on hold for the time being. 33% believe that a "break" doesn't change anything, and that the two parties are still engaged in a monogamous relationship. Soon after, Ross and Rachel spent a long time sorting out their split, with Ross defending himself with the "we were on a break" argument, while Rachel held fast to her belief that their break was not a stand-in for being single. Ross whole-heartedly threw his second marriage into the dumpster by not allowing himself to move past Rachel, and I would firmly call that "emotional cheating," since it was done with distinct intent. When a play breaks for intermission, the viewing audience isn't meant to go off and find a new play to watch. Friends' first core romance sparked up again in the beach house for the Season 3 finale and Season 4 premiere, in which Ross was dating Christine Taylor's sometimes-bald Bonnie. Ross doesn't get rid of Chloe in time and hides her behind the door as he opens it to find Rachel standing in front of him. Ross's sleeping with that copier girl was a reflex. Need we bring up the leather pants? What if a crime was involved here, and Ross and Rachel were somehow required to lay their situation out in a court of law, with a jury and judge responsible for finalizing a decision about where their relationship stood whenever Ross had sex with Chloe? Okay, I hear that opposites attract but come on! The characters were so exaggerated and never meant to be taken so seriously. The same way that a person who unintentionally kills another person (presumably) won't get found guilty of murder, Ross can't be viewed as guilty of cheating if he wasn't aware he was doing that. Rachel was such a worldly person, and Ross was the complete opposite of that. So whenever Rachel chose her work relationship (for obviously necessary reasons) and then upped the ante by declaring she wanted a break from him, it was all Ross needed to mentally check out of what should have been his most unbreakable bond. When he showed up at Bloomingdale's, it may have looked like Ross was trying to win Rachel's favor with food and birthday wishes, but he clearly wasn't interested in her desires, or he would have stayed at home from the get-go. As he checks the answering machine for messages, he hears a message from Rachel, saying that she loves him and that she'll drop by his apartment. Close. Mark is swarmy. As an example of the viewing public's inability to agree on Friends' Ross and Rachel situation, the dating app Plenty of Fish recently surveyed over 1,800 people to get their opinions on the matter (via People). The great debate of the ‘90s has been resolved. 2. What pisses me off with Ross is that he is livid when he assumes Rachel slept with Mark, and sleeps with a women with in moments after out of spite. Although Phoebe doesn't mind this, she's a little annoyed by Mischa, his translator, who follows them on dates and keeps interrupting with out-of-pla… Ross found out Rachel was with Mark, reinforcing his belief that they had broken up as well as leading him to believe that she had moved on.--Rachel finds out--Ross: I didn't think there was a relationship to jeopardise; I thought we were broken up. Rachel was a spoiled, self centered girl who never took responsibility for herself. Okay but hold up. Wrong discussion, wrong episode, wrong thread. (I dare say either Chandler or Joey could have made a bigger effort to get Ross out of there.) Whenever Ross and Rachel went through a rough patch on Friends, we, too, felt as though we were going through a rough patch (because empathy). Even if … Ross was family orientated and Rachel was ruled by the fashion world. One of the reasons why fans found it hard to contemplate the relationship between Rachel and Joey was because of its randomness. In response to Rachel's workday cutting into their one-year anniversary celebrating, Ross moronically showed up at her office unwelcomed, and then got extremely upset when Rachel was too busy to enjoy herself. He's the one that incessantly … Neither highlighting it as cheating nor saying that they were on a break justifies it. Who throws away another man's sandwich after not even finishing the fucking thing?!? Ross might have gotten away with it, too, if it wasn't for Chloe's meddling friends, who spread the word down the grapevine, where it reached Phoebe's ears. It was Chandler and Joey who told him not to. He's the one that incessantly tried to interrupt her workday(s), and his actions were partially motivated by arguably misplaced jealousy. I think "moved on" is a bit of a stretch. Ross thought that the woman he'd been in love with since high school left him for someone else. She can be upset that he decided to "rebound" so quickly, but she does not get to tell him that she owns his post-breakup sex life. That might have been a bit much to come up with on the spot, but I think the extra effort would have been worth it, all things considered. And Rachel is said to be a slut throughout the series but yet when it suited the writers she was.very naive. He doesn't even try to talk to Rachel or listen to her, he just hangs up on her and goes off to have sex. Rachel didn't say she wanted to "break up," which would have allowed Ross the opportunity to hook up with whoever he wanted. After initially agreeing to accept the letter's claims – which he did only because he fell asleep before reading it all – Ross later realized his error and got quite loud about re-defending his stance that they were on a break. The two did share a long KISS that definitely shouldn't have happened, though. Did Ross cheat on Rachel or it wasn't cheating because they were "on a break!"? A pretty surprising 60% of those polled agreed that Ross was not in the wrong when he slept with Chloe. You're missing the point. I still think he'd have told her and was trying to make sure it came from him and not someone else. Ross did try to cover up what he did, but he did want to be upfront with Rachel about Chloe. If they were, Ross would obviously be diagnosed for having deprrssion, and later on a hint of anger issues. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Tons of hilarious moments went down on Friends in its ten seasons at NBC, but part of the sitcom's lasting success lies in a series of never-ending debates about Ross and Rachel: did he cheat on her? This is a place for fans of various creative works to share theories, interpretations and speculation related to that particular creative work. Aug 23, 2019 @ 7:10am . But the biggest source of Friends-related arguments came all the way back in Season 3, and it all boils down to whether or not Ross and Rachel were "on a break.". Without any communication from Rachel clearing up what their status was, Ross likely continued to drunkenly misinform himself about the relationship to the point where he probably convinced himself Rachel never ever wanted to talk to him again. Her suspicions were more than solidified whenever he accidentally (or not?) Some couples break up once, and then realize they can’t live without each other, so they get back together. Even so, … If you wanted things to work out, you’d would’ve tried to come to a compromise instead of breaking up as soon as things got hard again. 10 Rachel & Joey: Where Did Rachel's Feelings Come From? … Archived. Ross lists every flaw he could think of Rachel - describing her as "spoiled, ditzy, too into her looks, and just a waitress" - but when he comes to Julie, all … She would blamed Ross for everything, even when she was obviously the one in the wrong. when youre drunk and someone you love breaks your heart entirely you are liable to do dumb stuff, New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the FanTheories community. So that proves his sleeping with the "cleaning lady in college" (by which I actually think you mean the librarian in high school) is simply a continuity error? In Ross' mind, his drunken transgressions with Chloe didn't amount to cheating on Rachel, largely because he thought their relationship had been put on indefinite hiatus. Both needed to grow up and be adults.. Even if they had broken up for real he slept with someone else only a few hours later. He invites himself over ignoring Rachel telling him no. Chandlertries to help him out with choosing one of Rachel and Julie by printing a list of flaws each of them have from his new computer. Meghan Markle’s character Rachel Zane on Suits cheats on Mike Ross by kissing ex-boyfriend Logan Sanders Click to share on Twitter (Opens … ive done similar. That of course is assuming that everyone agrees that they were indeed on a break. Ross did not cheat on Rachel. And so when another woman showed him attention of any kind, Ross took it to its drunk-logical conclusion without reflecting on how wrong he might have been about everything. He thought she was fucking Mark already. That whole thing with Chloe, though? I can't be the only one who can verify that alcohol and heartache lead to some really bad decisions. My biggest problem with Friends is how nobody acknowledges how shitty Susan is. Asked by Wiki User. So asking female Friends fans will get more anti-Ross answers than asking a purely male batch of responders. They're TOO different. 39. At his apartment, Ross is still in bed, fast asleep, when he's shaken up by the voice of Chloe. Rachel attempted to smooth things over with Ross via a long and emotional handwritten letter that which, for all the good it might have done, still held Ross up for blame. He wasn't aware Rachel still wanted a future with him, and thus couldn't conceivably do something that would jeopardize that, because Ross very obviously never fell out of love with Rachel throughout the entirety of Friends' ten seasons. Fans around the world no doubt have instinctively confident answers when that question comes up, whether they're calling out David Schwimmer's Ross for being a philandering dork, or if they're calling out Jennifer Aniston's Rachel for not being literal enough. Then that's when the copy shop chick seduces Ross over some drinks. It was not the sex with another woman that broke them up, it was the dishonesty that pushed Rachel to dump Ross, he had lied about sleeping with another woman, and lied about that same woman being in the apartment when Rachel came over to make amends. What would you do if you were Rachel? However, if you break up multiple times like Ross and Rachel did, then you probably shouldn’t be together. And no guy does what mark does for Rachel unless he wants that girl. The character of Emily Waltham played by Helen Baxendale had to be written off because she got pregnant with her first child. Ross could have made any number of decisions that would have allowed his relationship with Rachel to continue unencumbered that next day.
Jane Birkin Etienne Daho Couple, Liverpool Manchester City, Jens Petter Hauge Fm21, Nancy Dijon Hand, Quoi Jane Birkinfriends Saison 7 Chandler, Emilie Picch Enceinte, Dépendance énergétique Maroc, Train Montpellier Lyon Horaires Sncf, Sofiane Boufal Et Sa Copine,